Discussion:
[mb-users] how to handle "enhanced CD"??
Brian Whitehead
2014-10-04 17:42:14 UTC
Permalink
Could someone please explain how "enhanced CDs" with a partition containing
videos are supposed to be handled. I cannot find anything in the
documentation about this. I have a lot of CDs like this and they are never
found. A good example is the album Awake by Godsmack. In fact this album
didn't show up in either a artist or album search. When I started to add
it as a new release, it finally found 3 releases. I tried using one but
when I attach the DiscID, it shows a 12th track which is the video
partition.

I'm getting very frustrated with this and can't find anything in the
documentation to help.

?-- B
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20141004/203ad652/attachment.htm
Johannes Dewender
2014-10-04 21:41:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Whitehead
Could someone please explain how "enhanced CDs" with a partition
containing videos are supposed to be handled. I cannot find anything in
the documentation about this. I have a lot of CDs like this and they
are never found. A good example is the album Awake by Godsmack. In
fact this album didn't show up in either a artist or album search. When
I started to add it as a new release, it finally found 3 releases. I
tried using one but when I attach the DiscID, it shows a 12th track
which is the video partition.
I'm getting very frustrated with this and can't find anything in the
documentation to help.
The trailing data track gets discarded in the Disc ID calculation.
See this for technical details (users don't need to know these):
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Disc_ID_Calculation

The official style guide you are searching is this:
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Unknown_and_untitled/Special_purpose_track_title#Data_tracks
I notice there is no indication about that on
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Release
There is a question about that in the FAQ:
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Editing_FAQ#Does_MusicBrainz_store_information_about_data_tracks.3F_How_should_they_be_entered.2C_if_at_all.3F

An enhanced CD with 11 audio tracks and having a data track with a video
on track 12 shows up as a 11-track release on MusicBrainz.

So when you are using libdiscid (directly or indirectly, Picard uses
libdiscid) it does the right thing. If you use something else, there
might be a bug regarding data tracks.

Please tell us if there is a place in the Documentation where you
expected this information and it wasn't mentioned or linked.

--
JonnyJD
Brian Whitehead
2014-10-04 23:35:34 UTC
Permalink
Every time i have tried to import a disc id with one of these it has shown
up as an additional track with no way to delete it. It doesn't allow the
track to be deleted either. It requires a name. I've had to just give up
and not save my changes.

As far as where to find the documentation, i really don't know. It would
be nice to search for "enhanced cd" or similar terms that they are called
in the industry.
Post by Johannes Dewender
Post by Brian Whitehead
Could someone please explain how "enhanced CDs" with a partition
containing videos are supposed to be handled. I cannot find anything in
the documentation about this. I have a lot of CDs like this and they
are never found. A good example is the album Awake by Godsmack. In
fact this album didn't show up in either a artist or album search. When
I started to add it as a new release, it finally found 3 releases. I
tried using one but when I attach the DiscID, it shows a 12th track
which is the video partition.
I'm getting very frustrated with this and can't find anything in the
documentation to help.
The trailing data track gets discarded in the Disc ID calculation.
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Disc_ID_Calculation
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Unknown_and_untitled/Special_purpose_track_title#Data_tracks
I notice there is no indication about that on
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Release
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Editing_FAQ#Does_MusicBrainz_store_information_about_data_tracks.3F_How_should_they_be_entered.2C_if_at_all.3F
An enhanced CD with 11 audio tracks and having a data track with a video
on track 12 shows up as a 11-track release on MusicBrainz.
So when you are using libdiscid (directly or indirectly, Picard uses
libdiscid) it does the right thing. If you use something else, there
might be a bug regarding data tracks.
Please tell us if there is a place in the Documentation where you
expected this information and it wasn't mentioned or linked.
--
JonnyJD
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20141004/3e56bc5a/attachment.htm
Johannes Dewender
2014-10-05 00:43:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Whitehead
Every time i have tried to import a disc id with one of these it has
shown up as an additional track with no way to delete it. It doesn't
allow the track to be deleted either. It requires a name. I've had to
just give up and not save my changes.
Which tool do you use to create the disc ID and how do you import it?
Like I said, when using Picard or other supported tools it should not
show up as an additional track.

As far as the deletion goes: if you submit a release starting with a
disc ID you can't just remove a track that is part of the disc ID/TOC.
The problem is rather that the disc ID/TOC is wrong somehow.

So what tool are you using to create/submit the disc ID?

--
JonnyJD
Brian Whitehead
2014-10-05 01:11:50 UTC
Permalink
I'm using rhythmbox on Linux.

Brian Whitehead
bwhitehd at gmail.com
MB: 214.499.4142

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Johannes Dewender <brainz at jonnyjd.net>
Post by Johannes Dewender
Post by Brian Whitehead
Every time i have tried to import a disc id with one of these it has
shown up as an additional track with no way to delete it. It doesn't
allow the track to be deleted either. It requires a name. I've had to
just give up and not save my changes.
Which tool do you use to create the disc ID and how do you import it?
Like I said, when using Picard or other supported tools it should not
show up as an additional track.
As far as the deletion goes: if you submit a release starting with a
disc ID you can't just remove a track that is part of the disc ID/TOC.
The problem is rather that the disc ID/TOC is wrong somehow.
So what tool are you using to create/submit the disc ID?
--
JonnyJD
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20141004/94389322/attachment-0001.htm
Johannes Dewender
2014-10-05 01:57:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Whitehead
I'm using rhythmbox on Linux.
This is probably this known (and fixed) bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708991
summary:
Rhytmbox was using libdiscid up until 2.97 and everything was fine.
Then with 2.98 they used gstreamer for MusicBrainz Disc IDs. The
gstreamer implementation was broken.
The fixed gstreamer is gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.3.1).

So either use Rhytmbox <= 2.97 or make sure you have at least
gst-plugins-base1.0 version 1.3.1.

Another workaround is to use MusicBrainz Picard to submit enhanced CDs,
when you can't get working versions of the other tools easily.

About your other mail and the "contradiction".
MusicBrainz defines what a MusicBrainz DiscID should look like for a CD.
If a DiscID does not conform (because of bugs) then "things fall apart".
What that part tries to tell:
"Removing data tracks should work automatically when you add a DiscID",
which it does in the absence of (3rd party) bugs.


--
JonnyJD


PS:
I am aware that there is a Ubuntu LTS (Trusty Tahr) with "broken
versions" so the problem will haunt us for quite some time still.
Unfortunately the fix probably won't be backported to Trusty and/or
gstreamer 1.2.x. This is not in our hands. (gstreamer and Ubuntu are in
charge of that)
Brian Whitehead
2014-10-05 02:10:57 UTC
Permalink
?Thank you for the details. This all makes much more sense now. I'm
currently running CentOS 7. The rhythmbox version is 2.99.1-3.el7.x86_64.
The gstreamer version is gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-10.el7.x86_64.
I'll take a look at compling the source for Picard.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Johannes Dewender <brainz at jonnyjd.net>
Post by Johannes Dewender
Post by Brian Whitehead
I'm using rhythmbox on Linux.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708991
Rhytmbox was using libdiscid up until 2.97 and everything was fine.
Then with 2.98 they used gstreamer for MusicBrainz Disc IDs. The
gstreamer implementation was broken.
The fixed gstreamer is gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.3.1).
So either use Rhytmbox <= 2.97 or make sure you have at least
gst-plugins-base1.0 version 1.3.1.
Another workaround is to use MusicBrainz Picard to submit enhanced CDs,
when you can't get working versions of the other tools easily.
About your other mail and the "contradiction".
MusicBrainz defines what a MusicBrainz DiscID should look like for a CD.
If a DiscID does not conform (because of bugs) then "things fall apart".
"Removing data tracks should work automatically when you add a DiscID",
which it does in the absence of (3rd party) bugs.
--
JonnyJD
I am aware that there is a Ubuntu LTS (Trusty Tahr) with "broken
versions" so the problem will haunt us for quite some time still.
Unfortunately the fix probably won't be backported to Trusty and/or
gstreamer 1.2.x. This is not in our hands. (gstreamer and Ubuntu are in
charge of that)
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users at lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20141004/363118d3/attachment.htm
Per Starbäck
2014-10-05 14:31:49 UTC
Permalink
I'm currently running CentOS 7. The rhythmbox version is 2.99.1-3.el7.x86_64.
The gstreamer version is gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-10.el7.x86_64.
I'll take a look at compling the source for Picard.
If I remember correctly I have had the included version of
sound-juicer work regarding this when the included version of
rhythmbox didn't, in Fedora, so that might be another option for you.
Johannes Dewender
2014-10-05 18:21:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Per Starbäck
I'm currently running CentOS 7. The rhythmbox version is 2.99.1-3.el7.x86_64.
The gstreamer version is gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-10.el7.x86_64.
I'll take a look at compling the source for Picard.
If I remember correctly I have had the included version of
sound-juicer work regarding this when the included version of
rhythmbox didn't, in Fedora, so that might be another option for you.
Yes, sound-juicer uses MusicBrainz libdiscid and disc IDs should be correct.

--
JonnyJD

Brian Whitehead
2014-10-05 01:07:53 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Johannes Dewender <brainz at jonnyjd.net>
Post by Johannes Dewender
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Editing_FAQ#Does_MusicBrainz_store_information_about_data_tracks.3F_How_should_they_be_entered.2C_if_at_all.3F
?After reviewing two of the links provided, they seem to contradict one
another.

At
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Unknown_and_untitled/Special_purpose_track_title#Data_tracks
it states:

- If the data track comes last on the CD and isn't visible in an audio
CD player, the track should not be entered into MusicBrainz.

?And then at
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Editing_FAQ#Does_MusicBrainz_store_information_about_data_tracks.3F_How_should_they_be_entered.2C_if_at_all.3F
it states:

Data Tracks <https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Data_Track> should only be on
tracklistings if they appear when you try to submit a discID.

?
?The second statement makes more sense, since this is what happens and
there is no option to delete the additional track.

?-- B
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/attachments/20141004/595332b8/attachment.htm
Loading...